dubois
the origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind
julian jaynes 1976
interesting to me because (am halfway through) the forces at work in the bicameral mind seem to me to be still at work, just more subtly. autism, extremism, mental “illness”, and a reinvigoration of behaviour characteristic of the bicameral era could be our expressions of what we no longer, or cannot understand, or simply of what we do not control.
while i do not seem to have auditory hallucinations like he attributes to people of the bicameral era, the strong motivation to write, to understand, could be a different outlet for the same impulse.
scientific discovery in a model-centric framework: reproducibility, innovation, and epistemic diversity
berna devezer et al. 2019
doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216125
Reproducible scientific results are not always true and true scientific results are not always reproducible, according to a mathematical model produced by University of Idaho researchers. Their study, which simulates the search for that scientific truth, will be published Wednesday, May 15, in the journal PLOS ONE.
Independent confirmation of scientific results -- known as reproducibility -- lends credibility to a researcher's conclusion. But researchers have found the results of many well-known science experiments cannot be reproduced, an issue referred to as a "replication crisis."
"Over the last decade, people have focused on trying to find remedies for the 'replication crisis,'" said Berna Devezer, lead author of the study and U of I associate professor of marketing in the College of Business and Economics. "But proposals for remedies are being accepted and implemented too fast without solid justifications to support them. We need a better theoretical understanding of how science operates before we can provide reliable remedies for the right problems. Our model is a framework for studying science."
Devezer and her colleagues investigated the relationship between reproducibility and the discovery of scientific truths by building a mathematical model that represents a scientific community working toward finding a scientific truth. In each simulation, the scientists are asked to identify the shape of a specific polygon.
The modeled scientific community included multiple scientist types, each with a different research strategy, such as performing highly innovative experiments or simple replication experiments. Devezer and her colleagues studied whether factors like the makeup of the community, the complexity of the polygon and the rate of reproducibility influenced how fast the community settled on the true polygon shape as the scientific consensus and the persistence of the true polygon shape as the scientific consensus.
Within the model, the rate of reproducibility did not always correlate with the probability of identifying the truth, how fast the community identified the truth and whether the community stuck with the truth once they identified it. These findings indicate reproducible results are not synonymous with finding the truth, Devezer said.
Compared to other research strategies, highly innovative research tactics resulted in a quicker discovery of the truth. According to the study, a diversity of research strategies protected against ineffective research approaches and optimized desirable aspects of the scientific process.
Variables including the makeup of the community and complexity of the true polygon influenced the speed scientists discovered the truth and persistence of that truth, suggesting the validity of scientific results should not be automatically blamed on questionable research practices or problematic incentives, Devezer said. Both have been pointed to as drivers of the "replication crisis."
"We found that, within the model, some research strategies that lead to reproducible results could actually slow down the scientific process, meaning reproducibility may not always be the best -- or at least the only -- indicator of good science," said Erkan Buzbas, U of I assistant professor in the College of Science, Department of Statistical Science and a co-author on the paper. "Insisting on reproducibility as the only criterion might have undesirable consequences for scientific progress."
abstract Consistent confirmations obtained independently of each other lend credibility to a scientific result. We refer to results satisfying this consistency as reproducible and assume that reproducibility is a desirable property of scientific discovery. Yet seemingly science also progresses despite irreproducible results, indicating that the relationship between reproducibility and other desirable properties of scientific discovery is not well understood. These properties include early discovery of truth, persistence on truth once it is discovered, and time spent on truth in a long-term scientific inquiry. We build a mathematical model of scientific discovery that presents a viable framework to study its desirable properties including reproducibility. In this framework, we assume that scientists adopt a model-centric approach to discover the true model generating data in a stochastic process of scientific discovery. We analyze the properties of this process using Markov chain theory, Monte Carlo methods, and agent-based modeling. We show that the scientific process may not converge to truth even if scientific results are reproducible and that irreproducible results do not necessarily imply untrue results. The proportion of different research strategies represented in the scientific population, scientists’ choice of methodology, the complexity of truth, and the strength of signal contribute to this counter-intuitive finding. Important insights include that innovative research speeds up the discovery of scientific truth by facilitating the exploration of model space and epistemic diversity optimizes across desirable properties of scientific discovery.
most “biases” are in fact extremely useful heuristics
the limits of epistemic hygeine
sarah perry 2017
ribbonfarm.com/2017/03/02/the-limits-of-epistemic-hygiene/#more-5807
the mirror of the past
ivan illich 1991 9780714521701
joe sachs, st johns college usa sees in aristotle's nichomachean ethics a non–standard translation of hexis as an active state rather than passive habit.
iep.utm.edu/aris-eth
western philosophy is racist
bryan w van norden 2017
aeon.co/essays/why-the-western-philosophical-canon-is-xenophobic-and-racist
the path: what chinese philosophers can teach us about the good life
michael puett and christine gross–loh 2016
isbn9781476777856
the haunted world of humanity: ritual theory from early china
michael puett
academia.edu/4212050/
性自命出
xing zi ming chu
“nature emerges from the decree”
virtue through living
20160511
sounds a lot like what I am trying for, from a brief reading of puett’s interpretation
the guodian laozi: proceedings of the international conference, Dartmouth college, may 1998
unread
dao companion to the excavated guodian bamboo manuscripts
shirley chan 2019
guodian: the newly discovered seeds of chinese religious and political philosophy
kenneth holloway 2008
doesn't go far enough unfortunately — or fortunately, as there is still room for our interpretation. their book is preoccupied with American issues
mencius
as we would all race to save a child fallen down a well, so are we all capable of goodness
Eric Schwitzgebel
faculty.ucr.edu/~eschwitz/
philosophy of psychology, philosophy of mind, moral psychology,
classical Chinese philosophy, epistemology, metaphilosophy, metaphysics,
science fiction....
The Unskilled Zhuangzi: Big and Useless and Not So Good at Catching Rats
Eric Schwitzgebel 2017
faculty.ucr.edu/~eschwitz/SchwitzAbs/ZZSkill.htm
Human Nature and Moral Development in Mencius, Xunzi, Hobbes, and Rousseau
Eric Schwitzgebel 2007
faculty.ucr.edu/~eschwitz/SchwitzAbs/HumanNature.htm
Death, Self, and Oneness in the Incomprehensible Zhuangzi
Eric Schwitzgebel 2015
faculty.ucr.edu/~eschwitz/SchwitzAbs/DeathSelfZZ.htm
faculty.ucr.edu/~eschwitz/SchwitzPapers/ZZDeath-161031a.pdf
“Making a point to show that a point is not a point is not as good as making a
nonpoint to show that a point is not a point. Using a horse to show that a horse is not a horse is not as good as using a nonhorse to show that a horse is not a horse. Heaven and earth are one point, the ten thousand things are one horse”.
“Therefore his liking was one and his not liking was one. His being one was one and his not being one was one. In being one, he was acting as a companion of Heaven. In not being one, he was acting as a companion of man.”
life on the slippery earth
sebastian purcell 2018
aeon.co/essays/aztec-moral-philosophy-didnt-expect-anyone-to-be-a-saint
first women of philosophy: philosophy was once a woman’s world, ranging across asia, africa and latin america. it’s time to reclaim that lost realm
dag herbjørnsrud 2018
aeon.co/essays/before-the-canon-the-non-european-women-who-founded-philosophy
Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann_Alexander_Diels#Die_Fragmente_der_Vorsokratiker
polytonic Greek ocr
heml.mta.ca/lace/
gamera ocr
gamera.informatik.hsnr.de/addons/greekocr4gamera/#docs
the world as if
sarah perry 2017
ribbonfarm.com/2017/09/07/the-world-as-if/
the philosophy of ‘as if’: a system of the theoretical, practical and religious fictions of mankind
hans vaihinger 1911
c. k. ogden trans. 1924
not yet read
wiki entry
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Philosophy_of_'As_if'
archive.org (encrypted)
archive.org/details/philosophyofasif00vaih
the 7 laws of magical thinking
matthew hutson to read next
believing without evidence is always morally wrong
francisco mejia uribe 2018
aeon.co/ideas/believing-without-evidence-is-always-morally-wrong
the ethics of belief
william kingdon clifford 1877
‘it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence’
our beliefs influence our actions
‘No real belief, however trifling and fragmentary it may seem, is ever truly insignificant; it prepares us to receive more of its like, confirms those which resembled it before, and weakens others; and so gradually it lays a stealthy train in our inmost thoughts, which may someday explode into overt action, and leave its stamp upon our character.’
in our capacity as communicators of belief, we have the moral responsibility not to pollute the well of collective knowledge
friedrich nietzsche’s mental illness – general paralysis of the insane vs. frontotemporal dementia
orth m, trimble mr 2006
doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00827.x
natural-born existentialists
ronnie de sousa 2017
aeon.co/essays/how-evolutionary-biology-makes-everyone-an-existentialist
too like the lightning
ada palmer 2016 9780765378019
seven surrenders
ada palmer 2016 9780765378033
the will to battle
ada palmer 2017 9781786699565
the aporetic tradition in ancient philosophy
george karamanolis, vasilis politis 2018
justice: what’s the right thing to do
michael sandel to read next
the lagoon: how aristotle invented science
armand marie leroi 2014
the common good
robert reich 2018
nature as event: the lure of the possible
didier debaise 2017
philosophies of happiness: a comparative introduction to the flourishing life
diana lobel 2017
why buddhism is true: the science and philosophy of meditation and enlightenment
robert wright 2017
the routledge handbook of metaethics
tristram mcpherson, david plunkett 2017
beyond nature and culture
philippe descola 2013
nietzsche in context
robin small 2017
the buddha: an alternative narrative of his life and teaching
mukunda rao 2017
to heal a wounded heart: the transformative power of buddhism and psychotherapy in action
pilar jennings 2017
principles of non-philosophy: a critical introduction and guide
anthony smith 2016
total collapse: the case against responsibility and morality
stephen kershnar 2018
peter singer under fire: the moral iconoclast faces his critics
jeffrey schaler 2009
emergence: a philosophical account
paul humphreys 2016
genuine pretending: on the philosophy of the zhuangzi
hans-georg moeller, paul d’ambrosio 2017
more than happiness: buddhist and stoic wisdom for a sceptical age
antonia macaro 2018
philosophy after nature
rosi braidotti, rick dolphijn 2017
the fiction of evil
peter barry 2016
what is this thing called metaethics
matthew chrisman 2016
in the dust of this planet: horror of philosophy vol. 1
eugene thacker 2011
eco-alchemy: anthroposophy and the history and future of environmentalism
dan mckanan
the island of knowledge: the limits of science and the search for meaning
marcelo gleiser 2014
philosophy of nature
paul feyerabend 2016
the science of good and evil: why people cheat, gossip, care, share, and follow the golden rule
michael shermer 2004
why people believe weird things pseudoscience, superstition, and other confusions of our time
michael shermer 1997
there’s no right way to do the wrong thing
christopher gilbert 2018 unread
moral certainty and the foundations of morality
neil o’hara 2018 unread
does mood help or hinder executive functions? reactivity may be the key
martyn s. gabel, tara mcauley 2018
doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.02.027
hiking with nietzsche: on becoming who you are
john kaag 2018
american philosophy: a love story
john kaag 2016
the society of mind
marvin minsky 1985
cambridge pragmatism: from peirce and james to ramsey and wittgenstein
cheryl misak 2016
the metaphysics of science and aim-oriented empiricism: a revolution for science and philosophy
nicholas maxwell 2018
the pleasure principle: epicureanism: a philosophy for modern living
catherine wilson 2019
ramsey’s legacy
lillehammer, hallvard et al. 2005
what the buddha taught
walpola rahula 1959
opacity of mind: an integrative theory of self-knowledge
peter carruthers 2011
whatever you think, you don’t necessarily know your own mind
keith frankish 2016
aeon.co/ideas/whatever-you-think-you-don-t-necessarily-know-your-own-mind
check out the amazon.fr review of the book — lots of mentions of wittgenstein in that review
the philosophy of isaiah berlin
johnny lyons 2020 unread
the art of life
zygmunt bauman 2008 9780745643267
to read next
fiction not yet read
bannerless
carrie vaughn 2017
the wild dead
carrie vaughn 2018
rejoice, a knife to the heart
steven erikson 2018
not recommended
consilience: the unity of knowledge
edward o. wilson 1999
fly me to the moon
frank sinatra
makiaea
the moon shines my love
月亮代表我的心
teresa teng
中文
english
你问我爱你有多深
ni wen wo ai ni you duo shen
you ask how deep my love for you
我爱你有几分
wo ai ni you ji fen
just how much i love you
我的情也真
wo de qing ye zhen
my / heart is true
我的爱也真
wo de ai ye zhen
my / love is true
月亮代表我的心
yue liang dai biao wo de xin
the moon / it shows my love
你问我爱你有多深
ni wen wo ai ni you duo shen
you ask how deep my love for you
我爱你有几分
wo ai ni you ji fen
just how much i love you
我的情不移
wo de qing bu yi
my / heart stays true
我的爱不变
wo de ai bu bian
my / love stays true
月亮代表我的心
yue liang dai biao wo de xin
the moonlight / shines my love
☆轻轻的一个吻
qing qing de yi ge wen
just one / sweet caress
已经打动我的心
yi jing da dong wo de xin
fathoms / a heart’s still depths
深深的一段情
shen shen de yi duan qing
a bond / yet so deep
教我思念到如今
jiao wo si nian dao ru jin
even now / it calls me still
★你问我爱你有多深
ni wen wo ai ni you duo shen
you ask how deep my love for you
我爱你有几分
wo ai ni you ji fen
just how much i love you
你去想一想
ni qu xiang yi xiang
if you’re wondering
你去看一看
ni qu kan yi kan
you are sure to see
月亮代表我的心
yue liang dai biao wo de xin
the moonlight / shines my love
☆,★repeat
你去想一想
ni qu xiang yi xiang
if you’re wondering
你去看一看
ni qu kan yi kan
you are sure to see (from shore to sea)
月亮代表我的心
yue liang dai biao wo de xin
the moon / it shows my love
makiaea in english
robynn and kendy
in cantonese youtube
irina myachkin
youtube